ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide. Founded in 1992, ANIMAL PEOPLE has no alignment or affiliation with any other entity.
This site built and maintained by: Greanville Associates and Crescent Communications Rev. 4.10.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2005
 

 

 

 

 

ESSENTIAL DESTINATIONS

 

SEARCH OUR ARCHIVES
 
powered by FreeFind

JUNE 2005

Activist Court Calendar

The European Court of Justice on May 24 rejected a French attempt to overturn a European Union requirement that animal testing of cosmetics cease in the 25 member nations by 2009, along with imports of animal-tested cosmetic products. The French government argued unsuccessfully that the E.U. regulation would unjustly harm the competitive position of French cosmetics manufacturers.

Australian Federal Court Judge James Allsop, of Sydney, on May 27 dismissed an attempt by Humane Soceity International Aust-ralia director Michael Kennedy to sue the Japanese whaling firm Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd. for killing whales inside the Antarctic Whale Sanctuary, declared by the Austral-ian government but not recognized by Japan. Allsop accepted the argument of Australian attorney general Philip Ruddock that it cannot enforce a territorial claim not recognized by all parties to international agreements. Allsop allowed HSI, the global arm of the Humane Society of the U.S., to appeal to the full bench of the Federal Court.

Justice Stanley Burnton of the British High Court on April 12 authorized the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection to pusue an application for judicial review of decisions made by the Home Office when it licensed invasive experiments on monkeys at Cambridge University in 1998. The BUAV contends that the monkeys are used in ways that contravene the Animal Scientific Procedures Act of 1986.

The Oregon Court of Appeals ruled on April 20, 2005 that Oregon Health & Science University need not disclose the names of researchers at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center. In Defense of Animals argued that the identities of researchers should be disclosed in the public interest, but Oregon law specifically exempts Oregon Regional Primate Research Center employees.

U.S. District Judge Rebecca Doherty, of Lafayette, Louisiana, ruled on May 30, 2005 that the United Gamefowl Breeders Association, based in Albany, Ohio, had failed to establish that a 2002 federal law prohibiting interstate transport of gamecocks discriminates against Cajuns and Hispanic people. Doherty also rejected claims that cockfighting cannot be regulated as commerce because it is a hobby, and that the federal law usurps states’ rights in attempting to regulate morality.

A three-judge panel of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania on April 11 agreed that Lancaster Township has the right to enforce a 1982 ordinance against spotlighting, even though state law permits it. Hunters often sweep deer habitat with bright lights in the weeks before deer hunting season opens to track herd movements and find bucks they might try to shoot. Spotlighting can, however, startle rural residents who suddenly and repeatedly find their bedrooms lit up at odd hours. A related practice, “jacklighting,” uses light to cause deer to freeze, enabling an illegal night hunter to kill them more easily.