ANIMAL
PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative
coverage of animal protection worldwide. Founded in 1992, ANIMAL
PEOPLE has no alignment or affiliation with any other entity.
Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force chair
Johnny Rodrigues and Presidential Elephant Conservation Project elephant
fertility researcher Sharon Pincott contend that the stress associated
with gunfire has actually suppressed elephant fecundity--a finding which,
if verified, would contradict other studies showing that wildlife populations
tend to increase their fecundity under hunting pressure.
Both coyotes and deer, for example, notoriously
raise more young successfully when hunting has thinned their populations,
making more food available to the survivors.
But different mechanisms are at work.
While coyotes are hunted year-round, intensive
hunting pressure on coyotes tends to be limited to the spring birthing
season for cattle and sheep, and the fall deer hunting season, when deer
hunters often shoot coyotes as well.
Deer hunting occurs almost entirely within
a rifle season typically lasting only 10 to 14 days. Far fewer hunters
participate in the bow hunting and other "special" seasons that
precede and follow the rifle season, when gunfire is most frequent.
Intensive shooting in the Zimbabwean elephant
study area continued for several years.
Pincott, an Australian, has studied the
Presidential Elephants "for more than five years," Rodrigues
e-mailed to ANIMAL PEOPLE. The Presidential Elephants are "a clan
of more than 400 free-roaming elephants, individually known in more than
20 family groups, so named when President Robert Mugabe decreed them 'protected'
in 1990, to be a symbol, it was then said, of Zimbabwe's commitment to
responsible wildlife management.
"These habituated elephants can be
found on the unfenced Hwange Estate," Rodrigues said, "bordering
Hwange National Park.
"The home range of the Presidential
Elephants was underhandedly taken over by hunters, a situation now thankfully
rectified," Pincott told Rodrigues. "The elephants did, however,
endure more than two years of unethical hunting."
Said Rodrigues, "Elephant conception
rates during this period were negatively affected, with elephants coming
into estrus up to four times before they eventually conceived."
Elaborated Pincott, "Female elephants
only come into estrus once every three months. Some elephants took another
six and even nine months to conceive after the first time I witnessed
them in estrus.
Some elephants whom I witnessed in estrus
and being mated during late 2003 have only recently had their babies,
some 31 months later. They endured four sessions with the bulls before
becoming pregnant. This differs markedly from elephants whom I witnessed
in estrus during 2001 and 2002, before gunfire increased substantially,
who had their babies the usual 22 months later.
"Occasionally, at that time, elephants
were sighted back in estrus three months after an unsuccessful estrus,
but this was not the norm. Certainly there are no previous records of
the fertile elephants in this population taking up to nine months to conceive."
Added Rodrigues, "Data collection
continues now that the gunfire is better under control, to confirm that
conception rates have improved.
"Elephant numbers in Zimbabwe have
often been cited as having a negative impact on the numbers of smaller
species," Rodrigues noted, "which are said to be declining,
despite scientific studies in neighboring Botswana confirming that the
numbers of smaller species there continue to increase, despite their even
larger elephant population.
Concluded Rodrigues, "Gunfire continues,
legally, inside of Zimbabwe's National Parks. Although supposedly limited,
this 'ration hunting' gunfire has at times been reported to be out of
control. Some conservationists are now asking, 'Is gunfire negatively
impacting conception of all wildlife?"
"It is difficult for me to believe
that only elephants would be negatively affected," said Pincott.
The Pincott findings come amid continued
debate in South Africa over what to do about alleged elephant overpopulation
in Kruger National Park. Some park officials would like to cull the elephants,
as was done from 1967 to 1994, and seek Convention on International Trade
in Endangered Species permission to sell the elephants' tusk ivory.
Southern Africa Association for the Advancement
of Science president Ian Raper recommends dart-administered non-hormonal
contraception. "There are 5,326 female elephants in Kruger,"
Raper estimated for Agence France-Presse in 2005, "and it would cost
only 1.4 million rand, $208,303 or 178,459 euros annually, to administer
the contraceptive, which would work for two years."
"When people talk about threats to
bio-diversity," Raper added, "it would be well to remember that
old bull elephants topple trees, not the females and calves who would
be the targets of culling."
Relatively little has been done to research
ways to control bull elephant reproductive behavior, but Walt Disney's
Wild Animal Kingdom and the San Diego Wild Animal Park in 2005 funded
Colorado State University veterinary surgery professor Dean Henderickson
to experimentally vasectomize several South African wild bull elephants
in mid-2005.
"Except on smaller reserves,"
Henderickson told Denver Post staff writer Katy Human, "the elephant
herds are so big that going in and vasectomizing some will not make enough
of a difference fast enough. We're hoping that once the population has
been brought down to a reasonable number, we can help them prevent having
to cull again."
Vasectomizing an elephant is no simple
task, Henderickson added. "The approach into the abdomen is very
difficult because it's so hard to find landmarks. If you want to know
what it's like to find a rib in an elephant," he said, "walk
up to a textured wall and try to find a stud by looking."