ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide. Founded in 1992, ANIMAL PEOPLE has no alignment or affiliation with any other entity.

 

This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006

 

 

 

 

 

   

 
powered by FreeFind

ESSENTIAL DESTINATIONS

MONTH: October 2006

Letters to the Editor

Sanctuarians cross no-man's-land to save asses

I hope that you will let me update your readers on the work of the British charity Safe Haven for Donkeys in the Holy Land, dedicated to caring for working and abandoned donkeys in Israel and the Palestinian Territories.

 

Safe Haven was founded in 2000 by former British Airways flight attendant and Jerusalem SPCA volunteer Lucy Fensom, who saw first-hand the cruelty and neglect inflicted on many of the thousands of donkeys still used as beasts of burden in the region.

 

Today, at the Safe Haven sanctuary near the Israeli town of Netanya, 100 donkeys live free from pain and overwork, and have the chance to form herds and roam freely on the 4-acre site.

 

Safe Haven's work does not stop at the sanctuary gates. Aware that the donkeys living there are just a tiny percentage of those desperately needing help, Lucy has initiated free veterinary clinics in the Palestinian Territories. Each week Lucy and her team make the sometimes risky border crossing with Safe Haven's well-equipped mobile clinic to visit a different village and provide veterinary care, farriery and tooth rasping for the animals, and of course advice and support for the owners. Sometimes more than 100 donkeys, mules and horses are waiting for the team when they arrive.
Please visit our web site to find out more about Safe Haven. We now have a U.S. auxiliary, American Friends of Safe Haven for Donkeys in the Holy Land.

 

--Wendy Ahl
Safe Haven for Donkeys in the Holy Land
The Old Dairy
Springfield Farm
Lewes Road, Scaynes Hill
Haywards Heath,
West Sussex RH17 7NG
United Kingdom
Phone: 011-44-1444 -31177
Fax: 011 44 1444 831172
<wendy@safehaven4donkeys.org>
<www.safehaven4donkeys.org>

 

Humane thrift shop in Thailand

ReTails Pretty New Store is the very first animal welfare charity shop in Bangkok. It took about six weeks from deciding to try a commercial venture to raise funds to the actual opening. After lots of stops and starts and disappointments, we now have a posh shop in a smart location near Sukhumvit. Downstairs is designer and smarter second hand goods, and upstairs is a real bargain loft, which the Thais seem to love.

 

Our display shelves are old planks from a demolished Thai house, painted and supported on terracotta and plastic flower pots. We picked up bricks, stones and rough wood to display jewellery. Wicker baskets hold most of our displays.

 

The idea is to raise the money that we need each month to run our spay center, but we have no idea yet whether this is achievable.

 

We have partnered with Crown Relocations, an international removal company, to run a consignment service for large furniture items: 60% retained by the seller, 40% to Soi Dog Rescue, and Crown will pick up and store the items until sold. We'll put a photo of the furniture in the shop. We are hoping to fill the niche for expats who arrive and leave, with nowhere to buy or sell their unwanted large items. Currently everyone has to resort to ads in supermarkets or club notice boards. We hope large furniture consignments will provide the bulk of our income, but Thais frequent the shop, often to buy cheap items to resell in the markets. Foreign goods seem to be much prized.

 

We will also sell coffee and homemade cakes donated by volunteers.

 

I'm having sleepless nights, wondering whether we can pull this off, the problems being a fairly high rent and only volunteers to run the shop, stock it, and beg for merchandise. On opening day we took in twice our daily cost of running the spay center; today less than a third. I suppose these ups and downs will continue.

 

--Sherry Conisbee
President & cofounder
Soi Dog Rescue Bangkok
2240/3-4 Chankaow Road
Chongnontri, Yannawa
Bangkok, Thailand 10120
Phone: 66-02-336-0849

<sheridan@soidogrescue.org>
<www.soidogrescue.org>

 

Farm pigs add to waiting list of pigs needing sanctuaries

I have just read your September 2006 review of The Good Pig by Sy Montgomery. It was an excellent book review and prompted me to get the book. I, too had a very special farm pig friend named Big Earl, whom I recently lost.

 

However, the glut of miniature pigs of all breeds has not abated. My wife and I operated Mini-Pigs, Inc., a 17-acre pig sanctuary in Virginia, for a dozen years. We have recently merged our sanctuary with Shepherd's Green Sanctuary in Cookeville, Tennessee. We are now establishing a 100-acre preserve in Jamestown, Tennessee to handle the huge numbers of abused, abandoned and neglected miniature pigs and rescued farm pigs we are inundated with. The Preserve will partner with Shepherd's Green to provide a natural environment for around 400 healthy and active rescued pigs, while the sanctuary cares for the older, infirm, or otherwise compromised pigs who would not do well in the preserve environment.

 

This is an attempt on our part to try to deal with the huge numbers of pigs needing rescue and lifetime care in a better, less expensive and less labor intensive manner.

 

You mentioned that the Ironwood Pig Sanctuary still houses "dozens of aging pigs." In fact, last time I checked with my friends at Ironwood, they were housing around 400 or more rescued pigs...most of whom are not aged.

 

The vast majority of pig sanctuaries I deal with on a daily basis are full or overcrowded and are still turning away dozens of pigs each month due to a lack of space and/or funds.

 

To add to our difficulties, we are finding an increased number of rescued farm pigs needing sanctuary space. As the public becomes more attuned to the plight of the factory farmed pigs, many more are being rescued by animal rights groups and private citizens. So now, in addition to rescuing and caring for the thousands of "dumped" miniature pigs, we are asked to take in a steadily increasing number of full-sized farm pigs, while our resources, thanks to disasters such as Hurricane Katrina, are much more severely stretched.

 

--Richard and Laura Hoyle
The Pig Preserve
Jamestown, Tennessee

<rhoyle@TWlakes.net>

 

Live animal transport legislation

Thanks for an extremely informative September 2006 edition of Animal People, including the thoughtful article on the exemption in the California Animal Transport Bill, which deliberately excludes livestock from much-needed protection.

 

As Virginia Handley wisely pointed out, our current animal cruelty laws allow prosecution of those who leave pets in hot cars as a felony. This bill reduced the offense to a misdemeanor. This is shortsighted "feel good" legislation that sadly moved California backward by ignoring statistics and consequences.

 

Also, thanks for presenting the comments of Karen Davis of United Poultry Concerns regarding mailing baby chicks. Postal employees estimate that up to 70% of mailed day-old poultry does not reach the destination alive and/or healthy. One midwestern hatchery alone boasts on its website that it mails over four milion of these helpless creatures annually, and the Postal Service allows up to 72 hours without food and water for delivery.

 

Your article did not mention that the Humane Society of the U.S. launched a major campaign this year against this horrific practice. HSUS animal cruelty campaign director Ann Chynoweth has gained some major media coverage nationwide to enlist public support to defeat Senate Bill 2395, which would force airlines to carry birds at temperatures between zero and 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Inform-ation about the campaign is on the HSUS website.

 

--Phyllis M. Daugherty, Director
Animal Issues Movement
420 N. Bonnie Brae Street
Los Angeles, CA 90026
Phone: 213/413-6428
Fax: 213/413-SPAY

<ANIMALISSU@aol.com>

 

Thoughts about working animal retirement

I often wonder why there have been no amendments to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act in India since its inception way back in 1960, to find a way of getting some sort of a pension for retired working animals.

 

I do not think any horse cart puller or dairy farm owner, or for that matter anyone who has abandoned his working animal who became unfit for use, has been booked under this act, or is serving a jail sentence.

 

The recent willingness of the West Bengal Police department to pursue a pension arrangement for their horses with the Compassionate Crusaders of Kolkata comes as a great achievement in the history of animal welfare in India for retired animals.

 

Either we should do away with using animals for human interests, or we should pay them a pension, as we do for humans after retirement.

 

--Azam Siddiqui
107-C, Railway Colony
New Guwahati 781021
Assam, India
Phone: 91-84350-48481
<azamsiddiqui@animail.net>

 

Editor's note:
The idea that dairy cattle, draft animals, and others who serve humans should enjoy a comfortable retirement was incorporated into Jain, Buddhist, and Hindu teachings as long as 2,300 years ago. This led to the often abused custom of temples keeping animals, the practice of animal abandonment at temples, and the institution of gaushalas and pinjarapoles, originally to look after retired cattle but often operated by corrupt management as commercial dairies and sources of leather.
Among the oldest animal care projects of U.S. and European humane societies has been looking after retired police horses and war horses. Prominent early representatives of that custom include the Ryers Infirmary for Dumb Animals (1888) in Pennsylvania and the London-based Brooke Hospital for Animals (1934), founded by Dorothy Brooke to look after retired cavalry horses in overseas outposts of the British empire.

 

More recently, public pressure has obliged the U.S. government to fund the retirement of hundreds of chimpanzees and other nonhuman primates who were formerly used by NASA and projects of the National Institutes of Health.

 

That animals who have served humans deserve a decent retirement has also long been expressed in principle by zoos, the horse and dog racing industries, and military dog units, though reality remains that most zoo animals remain on exhibit until they die, only the most successful racing animals are "retired" to breed (and often eventually are sold to slaughter or sold to laboratories anyway), and many ex-military dogs are killed on "retirement," nominally because they might be dangerous, but cost-cutting is clearly also a consideration.

 

The weakness in animal retirement schemes is that none of them to date are funded by a pay-in system similar to the human pension plans of most developed nations, in which money is set aside as earned in dedicated funds.

 

As most developed nations already license at least some working animals, either governmentally or through private registries, and as tracking systems already govern the distribution of zoo animals, there is no inherent logistic obstacle to adding pay-in systems for animal retirement to the existing procedures--except that animal users would not like having to pay the small tax on animal services that would be needed to fund the animals' retirement.

Anti-bullfighting cities

ANIMAL, in cooperation with the League Against Cruel Sports, has launched the first campaign ever in Portugal to establish Anti-Bullfighting Cities.

 

Spain already has 32 cities which have declared themselves to be Anti-Bull-fighting Cities. France has at least one. Portugal does not yet have any.

 

ANIMAL is now targeting 10 cities in the Algarve region (Portimão, Lagos, Lagoa, Aljezur, Silves, Albufeira, Loulé, Olhão, Tavira and Faro) and one city near Lisbon (Sintra) with this campaign. The point of the campaign is to get tourists who visit the Algarve to write to the presidents of the target municipalities, urging them to commit to not allowing bullfights and to openly condemning these cruel spectacles. Tourists are asked to state that they are boycotting bullfighting cities, and that they would like to visit anti-bullfighting cities instead.

 

Our effort is coordinatied with the League Against Cruel Sports´ campaign to teach tourists to use their economic influence.

 

In Portugal, seeking local bans is much more realistic than seeking a nationwide ban for now, although the entire campaign will obviously make it easier for a national ban to eventually occur.

 

--Miguel Moutinho
Executive Director
ANIMAL
Apartado 2028
8501-902 Portimão
Portugal
Phone: 00-351-282-491-216
<miguel.moutinho@animal.org.pt>

First Fruits Festival

Since 1992, every year in December, at the First Fruits Festival near Nongoma in Zululand, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa, a large black bull is released into the Royal Kraal of King Goodwill Zwelithini. Thirty young Zulu warriors kill the bull with their bare hands in order to "prove their manhood."

 

A running battle takes place. Sand is repeatedly thrown in the bull's eyes. Eventually he becomes tired and is pulled to the ground. Sand is stuffed down his throat. His tongue is pulled out, his eyes are gouged out, his tail is broken, his penis is tied in a knot, his testicles are ripped off, he is kicked and jumped upon, and his neck is broken.

 

Killing the bull takes about 45 minutes. It is a display of extreme cruelty and brutality, and is against the Animal Protection Act of 1962, which states that it is an offense in South Africa to treat any animal in a manner which causes unnecessary suffering.

 

Yet in this instance the Animal Protection Act is powerless, because we have a constitution that protects people's cultural and traditional rights, even if cruelty to animals is involved.

 

This "cultural" cruelty treats "manhood" as an act only achieved by committing violence against animals. It encourages a culture and custom of violence among men. It is out of place in a nation that is fighting an epidemic of violence in all forms, e.g. four South African women a day are killed by their lovers. Kwazulu-Natal has the highest number of murders in South Africa every year.

 

"Someone who is cruel and violent to animals will also be so to people," says Professor Sean Kaliski, head of forensic psychiatry at Valkenberg Hospital in Cape Town.

 

Member of the National Parliament Gareth Morgan has several times over the past two years attempted to arrange a meeting between King Goodwill Zelithini and the National Council of SPCAs, without success.

 

This ritual should be replaced by sports and games, that do not use animals.

 

Living bulls are torn apart at other public events, and sometimes on "unofficial" occasions, but the main event each year is at the First Fruits Festival.

 

--Andries Pretorius
c/o Suite 293
Private Bag x1005
Claremont 7735
South Africa

 

Editor's note:
Unfortunately, the Zulu bullfighting practices are not unique. Similar torture is routinely inflicted on bulls and sometimes other animals around the world, including India, where more than 90% of the population professes to share a belief that cattle are sacred, and where bullfighting has been illegal since 1960. ANIMAL PEOPLE in May 2006 reported on the often frustrated efforts of the Blue Cross of India and the Visakha SPCA to try to get local police to enforce the law.

 

Zulu bullfighting and Indian bullfighting, called Jallikattu, differ mainly in that the Indian bullfights are held in public places, and all comers may participate. Also, the bulls sometimes "win," briefly. In January 2006, reported The Hindu, "Two persons were gored to death and 84 others injured in the Jallikattu organized in connection with a temple festival at Pallavarayanpatti in Theni district." In July, The Hindu noted the death of "a mentally unsound man" who tormented a bull in Bangalore.

 

Animal advocates have been campaigning to abolish farra do bois, the quite comparable Brazilian form of bullfighting, for more than a century. In farra do bois, the bulls often have fireworks tied to their horns.

 

Andean condor-and-bull fights have not been reported in several years, but on September 6, 2006, the same day that ANIMAL PEOPLE received Andries Pretorius' letter, the New York Times published an extensive expose of coleo, the Venzuelan form of bullfighting. Explained New York Times correspondent Simon Romero, "Four men on horseback chase a bull within a corridor about the length of a football field for about five minutes, competing to see who can tip the animal over the most times by pulling his tail. Of course, after the first fall, the coleador must get the bull back up and running. That is often accomplished by twisting his tail. Some exasperated riders bite the tail. On some occasions, attendants use an electric rod to shock the bull back to his feet. Some bulls break a leg when they fall. After the coleo, many of the bulls, bruised and worn out, are hauled to the slaughterhouse."

 

Both farra do bois and coleo evolved out of similar events held at Spanish village festivals, in which bulls and bull calves are chased, tortured, and usually killed by mobs --as at a much-protested festival in Algemesi, Velencia, Spain, on September 25-27, 2006. The annual bull-running event in Pamplona, in which the bulls chase the humans to the bull ring at which the bulls will be dispatched by professional toreadors, may have originated as a way for the men of Pamplona to show themselves to be braver than residents of other cities by giving the bulls a somewhat better chance to harm their tormentors.

 

As in India, most U.S. states have laws against such activities. Most states prohibit Spanish-style bullfighting, in which the bulls are killed in the ring. Some also prohibit or restrict horse-tripping, a staple of so-called Mexican-style rodeo. However, as SHARK founder Steve Hindi and colleagues have documented time and again, the bulls and calves used in U.S.-style rodeo quite commonly suffer tail-twisting, electroshock, kicking, punching, body-slamming, and jerking down with ropes, all with virtual impunity. Though most of these offenses are prohibited not only by law but also by the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association rules, the rules are rarely enforced, even when SHARK captures the violations on videotape.

 

Though the rituals of rodeo and most forms of bullfighting differ, the major difference to the animal is that instead of being killed on the spot, brutalized rodeo animals are hauled to slaughter afterward--as in Portuguese-style "bloodless" bullfighting.

 

In Spain, the nation most widely associated with bullfighting, "Marketing surveys show the number of Spaniards who say they have no interest in bullfighting has risen to more than 70%, from about 40% in 1970," Tom Hundley of the Chicago Tribune recently reported. "Among young people, the lack of interest is even more pronounced." Television coverage and attendance are in freefall, while the average age of Spanish attendees has risen to 40-plus.

 

The U.S. rodeo audience appears to be similarly collapsing, with declining crowds and television viewer share. But both bullfighting and rodeo promoters are mounting a vigorous defense of themselves in the name of preserving national cultures, including in Japan, where bulls are made to fight each other, rather than fighting human foes. The Japanese newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun, on September 19, 2006 headlined "Bullfight marks slow return to normalcy for Niigata community" above an article describing how "Bullfighting returned to a community in Niigata Prefecture, for the first time since a massive earthquake struck the area in October 2004." Representatives of nine villages participated in a bullfighting tournament, before 3,500 spectators, which Yomiuri Shinbun noted as "about three times more than usual."

 

The Japanese government calls the local form of bullfighting "an intangible cultural folk asset," apparently putting it in the same category as whaling and the Taiji dolphin slaughter, as relics to be preserved regardless of the indifference or even opposition of most of the public.