|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: November 2006 BooksOne At A Time: A Week in an American Animal Shelterby Diane Leigh & Marilee Geyer One At A Time is a heartbreaking account
of one week in an animal shelter. While many animals will find a new home,
many other exquisite animals will not. The pictures of the cats and dogs
at the shelter are compelling; it is tempting to recommend that this book
should be part of a national humane education curriculum at schools. "This is how companion animal overpopulation
works," Leigh and Geyer write. "Simple math, where the numbers
are lives and those responsible are unaccountable..." Unfortunately, their "simple math"
includes estimates of the numbers of animals killed in U.S. shelters that
are half again higher than at any time in the past 10 years, of the U.S.
feral cat population that roughly triple reality, and the old saw that
a single unaltered cat and her offspring can exceed 400,000 in seven years.
ANIMAL PEOPLE recently joined Wall Street Journal "Numbers Guy"
columnist Carl Bialik in tracing the latter claim to source. It apparently
originated as a January 1969 hypothetical projection of canine fecundity
by the Animal Protection Institute. The projection mysteriously picked
up one decimal place in repetition while still applied to dogs, and gained
another decimal place when applied to cats. Inflated estimates of the magnitude of
the U.S. pet population problem tend to cause public policy makers to
believe that sterilizing pets is futile, since humane workers seemingly
acknowledge to making no progress in decades of effort, that the situation
is hopeless, and that there are so many cats at large killing birds that
killing cats in high volume is the only possible response. Leigh and Geyer do, however, provide a
credible analysis of why a dog and cat surplus developed, and what the
consequences are of killing dogs and cats in still shockingly high volume. "It is a tangible sign of our society's
deep disconnection from other beings," Leigh and Geyer assess, "a
disconnection so profound and damaging that we could legitimately categorize
it as a sickness...šThe systematic mass destruction and disposal of millions
of living creatures every year constitutes a kind of violence in our society
that is no less violent because it is institutionalized and mostly overlooked.
When killing those who are closest to, and most dependent upon us becomes
an unquestioned fact of daily life, we have set a very dangerous and damaging
precedent as to what is ethically acceptable, what we are willing to tolerate,
and what we are capable of doing to others. How much easier is it to deny
consideration and compassion to one group when we have learned to accept
the mass killing of another-and especially, of beings whom we call our
'friends'? "The homeless animal issue is critically important," Leigh and Geyer believe, "because it is so fundamental: dogs and cats are the closest most people ever get to other species and the natural world. If our concern and compassion are so weak and limited that we are unable to save those animals closest to us, how will we ever be able to save the more distant beings--the endangered species we may never see, the redwoods and mountains and wilderness we may never visit, the suffering people we may never meet and whose misery we may never experience directly?" --Beverley Pervan
The Medici GiraffeAnd Other Tales of Exotic Animals
and Power (1271 Ave. of the Americas, New York,
NY 10020), 2006. 412 pages, paperback. $24.99. Marina Belozerskaya has given us a diverse
collection of mini histories beginning in ancient Egypt. She examines
exotic animal-keeping in the Roman Empire, Renaissance Florence, Aztec
Mexico, Bohemia, Napoleonic France, and the early 20th century U.S. Through time and across continents, Belozerskaya
reveals the use and abuse of exotic animals by powerful people. A postscript about the sale from China
to the U.S. of two giant pandas, at an exorbitant price, in order to cement
relations between the two global powers, shows that when it comes to using
animals to advance the goals of ambitious people, nothing has changed
in two and half thousand years. Nearly 300 years B.C., the Roman general
Ptolemy Philadelphos kept a magnificent menagerie of captive wild animals
at his palace in Alexandria. He spent a fortune on capturing wild elephants,
the battle tanks of the ancient world, for military use. Roman rulers
frequently bought political popularity with the blood of captured African
and Asian wildlife. But according to Pliny, the emperor Pompey once misjudged
how even brutal Roman spectators would respond to a group of some twenty
elephants at the infamous Circus Maximus. "When they had lost all hope of escape,"
Pliny wrote, "they tried to gain the compassion of the crowd by indescribable
gestures of entreaty, deploring their fate with a sort of wailing, so
much to the distress of the public that they forgot Pompey and his munificence,
carefully devised for their honor, and bursting into tears rose in a body
and invoked curses on the head of Pompey, for which he soon afterward
paid the penalty." We learn how Lorenzo de Medici, the powerful Florentine merchant who wished to attain royal status, kept a menagerie of exotic animals, whom he habitually traded for political favours. In Mexico the 16th century Aztec King Montezuma maintained a marvellous collection of captive wild animals at his prosperous capital city. The conquistadores under Hernando Cortes set fire to the zoo, burning all the animals to death, in order to advance their colonial goal of terrorizing the natives. And so on.
The reader discovers how Rudolf XI, the
Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire in early 17th century Europe, neglected
his affairs of state, with dire consequences for all of Europe, because
of his obsession with wildlife and the study of flora and fauna. We learn
that while Napoleon Bonaparte was off butchering millions of Europeans,
his wife Josephine assiduously acquired, from as far away as Australia,
a large collection of animals for her private zoological park. In early
20th century America, news magnate William Randolph Hearst burdened his
huge publishing empire with the cost of purchasing exotic animals from
all over the world to stock his 60,000 acre private zoo at San Simeon,
California. For the most part the stories end badly
for the animals, and continue to have bad endings in our own time. Belozerskaya,
for example, might have mentioned Cecil John Rhodes, the English colonial
who annexed Southern Africa to the British Crown at the turn of the 20th
Century. Like so many potentates, Rhodes imported
exotic animals for his private zoo, located on the slopes of Table Mountain,
looming over Cape Town. Among the exotic imports were a few Himalayan
tahrs, who escaped, adapted well to Table Mountain, and by 2004 had reached
a population of several hundred. In that year the South African National
Parks Board decided that all "alien" animals would be exterminated.
The killing took several weeks of military-style assault, using ground
troops and helicopter gunships. No doubt Hernan Cortes and his arsonist conquistadors would have applauded the bloodshed. --Chris Mercer, <www.cannedlion.co.za/>
The World of the Polar Bearby Norbert Rosing Among Wild Horses:A portrait of the Pryor Mountain
Mustangs
The World of the Polar Bear and Among
Wild Horses are a world apart from most of the other coffee table books
we've seen lately. First of all, the exquisite photos show
authentic wild animals, in panoramic views of the wild, except for some
mustangs in Among Wild Horses who appear to be in a holding corral after
a recent round-up. Second, the text actually describes what
the photos show, and often explains how the photographer captured the
scene. Neither The World of the Polar Bear nor Among Wild Horses is a
recycled thesis, going into depth and detail about biological facts while
evading the controversies surrounding their subjects. The World of the Polar Bear and Among
Wild Horses largely save their pleading for the last pages, but both are
direct appeals for animals who are jeopardized by present U.S. policies.
Both World of the Polar Bear author/photographer Norbert Rosing and Among
Wild Horses photographer Lynne Pomeranz make their cases mostly with the
photos and anecdotes that they collected in person during long stays among
their subjects. As well as capturing almost every aspect
of wild polar bear life, Norbert Rosing provides many memorable shots
of the creatures who share their habitat, especially Arctic foxes, who
along with ravens are polar bears' frequent sidekicks. Rosing even caught
one Arctic fox in the act of nipping at a polar bear's heels--perhaps,
Rosing speculated, to urge the bear to go hunt a seal for both of them.
The bear shows no sign of inclination to harm the fox. Dangerous as polar
bears can be, they tend to be more patient and playful than menacing toward
anything that isn't either potentially dinner or a serious threat. The major threat to both polar bears and
Arctic foxes these days is global warming, fast shrinking the bears' seal
hunting habitat and flooding foxes out of their dens as the permafrost
thaws into vast bogs. Compared to the Arctic, the Pryor Mountain
wild horses inhabit a veritable Garden of Eden along the Montana/Wyoming
border. The Crow tribe, who share much of the horses' range, point out
that the habitat in all directions from Pryor Mountain is much less hospitable. The Pryor Mountain horses have been protected
from roundup for slaughter since the 1968 creation of the Pryor Mountain
Wild Horse Range, three years before the 1971 passage of the Wild Free
Roaming Horse and Burro Act. Yet the Pryor Mountain mustangs--and all
wild horses--are still at risk as result of federal policies favoring
ranchers, who perceive the mere 40,000 horses still on the U.S. range
as threats to the well-being of more than four million cattle. Among Wild Horses opens with Hope Ryden's
account of how her work as a television reporter helped to save the Pryor
Mountain horses in 1968, and concludes with Rhonda Massingham's appeal
on their behalf today. "The Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range falls
under the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, and National
Park Service management, all of which juggle the health and well-being
of the horses there with other values," Massingham points out. "Due
to these multi-agency and multi-use agendas, the Pryor Mountain mustangs
are restricted to a much smaller, less productive range than they roamed
when the law was passed. The BLM reports that this area cannot presently
sustain the number of horses on the range." In recent years the Pryor Mountain horse population has been controlled by one of the first successful applications of wildlife contraception. --Merritt Clifton
Rescued: Saving Animals from Disaster:
|