|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: January/February 2007 Editorial: Developing compassion for feral pigs
Here come the pigs! Nobody expected feral
pigs and street pigs to become a ubiquitous humane concern in the early
21st century--but not because of indifference toward pigs. Most people
just didn't think of pigs as a free-roaming species who might turn up
almost anywhere, capable of thriving without human help. But the timing
is right for feral pigs and street pigs to claim humane attention. More
pigs may be at large today, worldwide, than ever before. Certainly more
pigs are at large in North America. Pig hunters are all but exempt from most
of the laws that govern other forms of hunting, since pigs are considered
a non-native invasive nuisance. So-called hog/dog rodeo, in which packs
of pit bull terriers are set upon captive feral pigs, has only been illegal
in many Southern states for under two years, and--like dogfighting and
cockfighting--still has a substantial following. The technology exists to control and perhaps
eliminate unwanted feral pig populations without bloodshed. The leading
immunocontraceptive approach to animal birth control is based on porcine
zona pellucida, PZP for short, a slaughterhouse byproduct. Though PZP
proved ineffective and impractical for use with dogs and cats, it is now
widely used to control wild horse herds, zoo animal fecundity, and--experimentally--urban
deer. Zona pellucida cells from another species would be needed to achieve
immunocontraception among pigs, but at this point there are few animals,
including humans, whose reproductive biochemistry is better understood
than that of pigs. Most important, while pigs are institutionally
mistreated by the pork industry at the rate of 60 million per year in
the U.S. alone, almost entirely out of public view, the climate of public
opinion has never been more favorable to individual pigs, with names and
familiar faces, like many of the "problem pigs" now patrolling
semi-rural suburbs. The classic children's story Charlotte's
Web, by E.B. White, has raised compassion for pigs since 1952-first as
a book, then as a 1973 animated film, now in 2006 as a computer-generated
live action film, endorsed and promoted by the Humane Society of the U.S. Increasing humane awareness of pigs was
already an integral if indirect aspect of producing the newest version
of Charlotte's Web, after Paramount Pictures donated a substantial but
undisclosed sum to Animals Australia in exchange for help in adopting
out the 40 trained pigs used to make the film. In early November 2006,
Animals Australia and allied organizations reportedly invested $500,000
Australian dollars in billboard and women's magazine advertising against
factory pig farming. Eight magazines and one billboard company rejected
the ads, which were then published in newspapers instead--and the fracas
attracted newspaper coverage. Three other films featuring pigs who evade
slaughter have become recent hits: Babe (1995), Gordy (1995), and Babe:
Pig In The City (1998). Actor James Cromwell, who starred in the Babe
films as Farmer Hoggett, became a vegetarian and animal advocate. Such pro-pig popular literature has a
long pedigree. Twenty-five years before E.B. White produced Charlotte's
Web, Walter R. Brooks from 1927 to 1958 raised consciousness about pigs
in his 28-volume series about the adventures of Freddy the Pig and his
upstate New York farmyard friends, who evaded slaughter time and again
by acting as human-like as possible. Meat-eaters in the early stories,
Freddy and the farm owners, Mr. and Mrs. Bean, eventually became somewhat
reluctant and inconsistent quasi-vegetarians. Soon afterward, the Freddy
books lapsed from favor as longtime staples of school libraries. Humane literature evolved into addressing
how real-life pigs are raised and slaughtered after the 1964 publication
of Animal Factories, by Ruth Harrison, and the 1967 formation of Compassion
In World Farming by the late Peter Roberts. Banning gestation crates,
in which pregnant and nursing sows are imprisoned, was for Roberts an
enduring focus. Pet pigs splashed into humane awareness
after the Vietnam War, when the pampered potbellied pigs carried to safety
by some of the Vietnamese "boat people" fleeing the Communist
regime attracted media coverage, caught the fancy of pet breeders, and
became a heavily promoted fad animal. A network of mostly overwhelmed
and underfunded pig sanctuaries formed in response to frequent pig abandonment. The sanctuaries that survived the inevitable
shakeout are now "finding an increased number of rescued farm pigs
needing sanctuary space," explained Pig Preserve founders Richard
and Laura Hoyle in an October 2006 letter to ANIMAL PEOPLE. "As the
public becomes more attuned to the plight of the factory farmed pigs,"
the Hoyles wrote, "many more are being rescued by animal rights groups
and private citizens. So now, in addition to rescuing and caring for the
thousands of "dumped" miniature pigs, we are asked to take in
a steadily increasing number of full-sized farm pigs." Feral pigs emerged as an early concern
of the Fund for Animals, during the 25-year effort of the U.S. Navy, Nature
Conservancy, and National Park Service to extirpate pigs from San Clemente
Island and the Channel Islands, off the southern California coast. Some
rescued pigs from the California coastal islands were transported to the
Black Beauty Ranch in northeastern Texas during the 1970s and 1980s, but
their rescues attracted far less attention than the Fund's earlier rescues
of burros from San Clemente and the Grand Canyon. Later, in 1991-1993, PETA cofounder Alex
Pacheco tried to drum up opposition to Nature Conservancy tactics against
feral pigs in Hawaii, including aerial shooting and setting snares in
which caught pigs died slowly, over many days. In Defense of Animals protested
against cruel methods of pig extermination in the hills surrounding San
Francisco Bay. The Suwanna Ranch sanctuary operated by the Humane Farming
Association took in several pigs who went feral after escaping from human
custody or being abandoned. Yet feral pigs as a nationally spreading
ecological issue and animal welfare problem largely eluded the humane
community--and largely eluded wildlife managers, as well, whose first
recognition of the presence of feral pigs has usually come several pig
generations after they became established, when they emerge as a widely
distributed public nuisance. No set of institutions enthusiastically
claims responsibility for feral pigs in the U.S., as in most of the world.
While licensed pig hunting may generate some revenue, feral pig activities
tend to be more problematic than lucrative. Agricultural agencies see
feral pigs as an uncontrolled and unpredictable disease vector. Public
health and safety agencies want someone to respond to pig complaints,
as to dog and cat complaints, but even when animal control is under their
umbrella, animal control agencies mostly lack experienced pig catchers
and handlers, holding facilities suitable for pigs, and vehicles that
can haul them. The advent of central garbage collection
and enclosed sewage systems eliminated free-roaming pigs from most U.S.
and European cities many decades ago. Until recently, feral pigs were
found only in remote rural regions, like the hills of Arkansas, whose
wild razorbacks were considered a quaint artifact. But that was before long-haul pig trucking
and frequent highway accidents gave thousands of pigs the opportunity
to bolt from ruptured trailers in habitat of every sort, before raising
European boars for confined hunting operations became commonplace, and
before hints emerged that some ardent pig-hunters might be deliberately
translocating feral pigs to try to expand pig hunting opportunities. That was also before free-roaming dogs
declined from 30% of the U.S. dog population circa 1950 to about 25% in
the mid-1970s, to under 5% today. Dogs, rats, & pigs Nature abhors a void, so when dogs no
longer roam at large, their habitat niches are claimed by other species. Usually the first replacements are cats,
already present and relatively abundant. Where free-roaming dogs dominate
the habitat by day, consuming most of the edible refuse, catching many
of the rats and mice, cats tend to be nocturnal, inclined to live on roofs
and balconies, rarely descending to risk canine pursuit. As soon as the
dogs disappear, however, many cats become diurnal, replacing dogs at a
typical ratio of three cats for each dog who is no longer there--about
the body mass ratio of average cats to typical street dogs. Communities that never before noticed
cats may suddenly discover that they have enough feral cats to be problematic.
Examples include Hong Kong, the developed parts of Costa Rica, much of
the U.S. during the past 20 years, and the many Indian cities where Animal
Birth Control programs have sharply reduced the abundance of street dogs. But cats are not quite a perfect replacement
for dogs. The very attributes that enable cats to coexist among street
dogs tend to leave significant habitat niches vacant. For example, as
pure predators, cats rarely scavenge. When dogs are removed from urban
habitat, most of the scavenging role may be left to mice and rats, who
formerly were among the dogs' prey. Mice and rats quickly breed up to the
newly expanded carrying capacity of any habitat from which dogs have been
removed--especially if dogs are no longer eating them. However, even if
humans refrained from poisoning mice and rats in response to any visible
abundance, mice and rats are not well-adapted to holding habitat. Instead,
they attract other predators such as jackals, coyotes, foxes, and birds
of prey in place of dogs, while accessible refuse draws in larger or more
evasive scavengers--such as pigs, monkeys, and gulls--who can fend off
or escape the predators. In effect, the previous role of dogs as
scavengers and rodent predators is replaced by mice-plus-cats-plus-rats-plus
whatever else comes. The simple scavenging habitat niche becomes a complex
food chain, in which the especially complex role of rats tends to be overlooked
because it mostly occurs beyond human view. Like dogs, rats will eat almost anything.
Also like dogs, rats can become predators if conditions favor predation.
Where mice are abundant, rats tend to become voracious nest predators
of "pinky" mice. Rats could in theory totally replace the
roles of street dogs, and in cities with modern sanitation, where the
scavenging niche is reduced and scattered to the point that roving dogs
have a hard time making a living, this is what tends to happen. Where
dogs once roamed the streets, rats patrol inside the walls of high-rise
buildings. Though feral cats are more visible, rats outnumber them, thousands
to one. Until the scavenging niche is reduced
and diminished, however, removing dogs from the habitat has a different
outcome. In Asian, African, and Latin American
cities, especially those without closed sewage systems and frequent trash
collection, where refuse remains sufficiently accessible to support street
dogs, pigs and monkeys tend to be the ultimate beneficiaries of reducing
the dog population. Though both pigs and monkeys can kill dogs in fights
which could go either way, pigs and monkeys tend to run from dogs rather
than take chances. Otherwise, the major threats to pigs and monkeys in
most urban habitat are motor vehicles. Neither pigs nor monkeys have anything
to fear from cats, or rats. In U.S. cities, where closed sewage systems
and frequent refuse collection prevail, the food sources most accessible
to urban wildlife tend to be yard vegetation. While dogs do not eat yard
plants, they do chase other animals out of yards and out of the neighborhood,
if they can. Removing free-roaming dogs from the habitat typically allows
urban wildlife to exploit the vegetation undisturbed, if they just stay
out of the fenced yards where dogs remain. Raccoons, occupying approximately the
same habitat niche in North America that monkeys hold in India, are among
the most ubiquitous beneficiaries. Nowhere in the wild are raccoons as
abundant as they have become in U.S. suburbs, at population densities
as great as 300 per square mile in parts of New England. Other species who are now more abundant
in U.S. suburbs than in the wild include both whitetailed and blacktailed
deer, and opossums, whose expansion of range into the northern half of
the U.S. closely followed the construction of the interstate highway system
in the 1950s and 1960s. Occupying a relatively limited habitat niche at
first, opossums have proliferated during the past several decades in approximate
inverse to the frequency with which dogs are picked up for running at
large. The conditions conducive to pig proliferation
in the U.S., Britain, and other developed nations where fast-expanding
feral pig populations have become troublesome are not quite the same as
the conditions that enable pigs to take over vacated dog habitat in much
of Asia. Yet there are similarities. To a pig, a marketplace full of discarded
fruits and vegetables differs little from a yard full of windfallen fruit
from ornamental trees and hedges. Muddy roadside ditches are wonderful
travel corridors. Pigs make themselves equally at home among
cornfields, orchards, refuse piles, and forests full of fallen acorns
and fungi. Almost anywhere suits a pig, if the pig has food, mud, and
companions. A combination of high intelligence, easy satisfaction, and
litter sizes averaging more than twice the average dog litter size make
pigs at least as potentially ubiquitous as dogs. If tolerated, pigs will sleep in the sunshine,
in full view of all. If responded to with humane consideration, pigs can
become good neighbors, occupying their present limited ecological niche,
potentially controlled by immunocontraceptive baits. If pigs are hunted, on the other hand,
they will spend daytime in deep dens, foraging and traveling only at night.
The cleverness and reproductive potential that enabled pigs to evade extermination
on small rocky islands for 25 years will ensure that even the most aggressive
and ruthless efforts to kill them all will fail--indeed, pigs have never
been lastingly extirpated from any habitat other than small islands--and
will ensure, as well, that the plight of feral pigs will attract increasing
humane attention in coming decades. Beyond practical considerations, demonstrating concern for feral pigs could help to set a persuasive example to the public and to agribusiness of how pigs ought to be treated--and perhaps hasten the day when pig-eating is looked upon with the same revulsion that most of the world now feels toward dog and cat eating.
|