|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: November/December 2007 Big puppy mill raids "barked up the right tree" for mass media
WASHINGTON D.C.--Raids on alleged puppy mills in at least five states closely followed the November 1, 2007 launch of a Humane Society of the U.S. pre-holiday media blitz against lax regulation of dog breeders. A five-month HSUS investigation found more than 900 active dog breeders in Virgina, of whom only 16 held USDA permits to breed dogs for sale across state lines, summarized HSUS publicist Leslie Porter. "To sell puppies to pet stores, breeders with more than three breeding females are required by federal law to have a license," Porter said. "The HSUS investigation found that many breeders are violating this law," often by selling directly to the public through web sites. An HSUS undercover team "documented puppy mills throughout the state," Porter said, "including in Hillsville, Jewel Ridge, Atkins, Ferrum, Staunton, and Lynchburg, and pet stores who buy those dogs, including in Fredericksburg, Ashland, Midlothian and Waynesboro. The HSUS found dogs being harmed and abused; laws being ignored, and consumers being duped over and over again." U.S. humane societies have issued pre-Christmas warnings against buying puppies from puppy mills for at least 75 years, ANIMAL PEOPLE recently found through searching <www.NewspaperArchive.com> and the back editions of the National Humane Review for the origin of the term"puppy mill." "Puppy mill" appears to have crossed from humane jargon into general usage in 1953. The latest HSUS findings were accordingly treated as old news and drew little attention from most mass media, until about 24 hours after the release was e-mailed. Then, responding to a tip from Virginia Partnership for Animal Welfare and Support, of New River Valley, Carroll County animal control officers and a veterinarian visited Horton's Pups, operated by Junior Horton of Hillsville. Licensed to keep as many as 500 dogs, Horton had about 1,100 dogs on the premises. "Apparently, HSUS was barking up the right tree," acknowledged Donna Alvis-Banks of the Roanoke Times. "Horton, who advertises his small-breed puppies on the Internet via the Continental Kennel Club Web site, agreed to surrender most of his dogs after talking with the officials, according to Carroll County administrator Gary Larrowe." Horton advertised Yorkshire terriers, poodles, Maltese, Shih Tzus, Lhasa apsos, and other small dogs, at prices usually ranging from $250 to $500 apiece. The Horton case was the third breeder raid of note in the southern U.S. within two weeks, but was magnitudes larger than the October 17 seizure of 13 small dogs from the premises of Ted and Maria Rushing in Madison County, Arkansas, where 37 dogs were found in all, and the October 19, 2007 seizure of 106 dogs, including 80 toy poodles, from the home of Janie Conyers in Raleigh, North Carolina. Both of the earlier cases included seizures of other animals, as well as dogs. Captain Robert Boyd of the Madison County sheriff's office told Ginny Laroe of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette that four dogs found on the Rushing property were seriously injured. One had a broken back, one had been shot, and two dogs were returned to people who identified them as stolen. More cases of alleged mass neglect by dog breeders came to light in three other states during the next three weeks. Serving a search warrant in a reportedly unrelated child pornography investigation, police detectives in Salem, Oregon on November 16, 2007 found four children and 25 poodles in allegedly unsafe and unsanitary conditions. Audra L. Kelley was arrested on two counts of first-degree criminal mistreatment, Salem Police Lieutenant Jim Anglemier told Dennis Thompson and Ruth Liao of the Salem Statesman Journal. Two other residents of the house, Kevin Lee Deal, 45, and Sarah Marie Deal, 40, were charged with offenses pertaining to child and animal neglect. "The house was considered unfit for human habitation by Marion County officials," wrote Thompson and Liao. "The Deals' two children, Kelley's two children, and the 25 poodles were removed from the home." The Colorado Department of Agriculture on November 19, 2007 confirmed that it has opened an investigation of Colorow Kennels in Olathe, reported Beverley Corbell of the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel. Citizens for Animal Welfare & Shelter president Vendla Stockdale of Crawford, Colorado, disclosed the investigation in a November 10 e-mail to the Daily Sentinel. "In her e-mail," said Corbell, "Stockdale wrote that HSUS helped build a case against Colorow Kennels," but the details were withheld because of an agreement Stockdale claimed to have to provide an exclusive to a Denver television station. Colorow Kennels owner Nita Smith apparently started the business in 1980, after previously operating as Nita's Dog Patch. "I have actively been raising puppies since 1959," Smith told Corbell. The Humane Society of the Black Hills on November 21, 2007 seized 24 malamutes and found the remains of 11 other dogs at the home of Chad and Soteria Cooper in Rapid City, South Dakota. Alaskan Malamute Assistance League president Dan Anderson of Bellville, Texas, alerted malamute fanciers throughout the west to try to find homes for the dogs whenever they can be released from impoundment, after initially being held as evidence. The raids on alleged puppy millers lent momentum to proposals to increase regulation of dog breeding and sale, including in Oklahoma, where state representative Lee Denny, DVM, on November 6 promised to introduce a bill drafted by the Oklahoma Veterinary Association. "The issue is animal welfare and public health," Oklahoma Veterinary Association legislative task force chair Billy Clay told Ron Jenkins of Associated Press. "Clay said Oklahoma is second only to Missouri in the commercial production of household pets. He said there are 645 breeders registered with the USDA and at least three times that many who are not registered and have no oversight whatsoever," wrote Jenkins "The draft plan presented by the task force would require regulation of breeders who have 25 or more dogs, cats, kittens, or puppies." The puppy mill raids underscored the point that neglect of animals by breeders appears to be growing throughout the U.S., parallel to the growing demand for puppies and declining availability of puppies from shelters. After more than 20 years of slumping sales, while shelters raised their share of the pet acquisition market from about 14% to more than 21%, breeders have taken advantage of a recent shortage of small dogs and puppies in shelters, pushing their sales up from an estimated low of barely two million puppies per year to more than four million. But puppy millers are scarcely alone in neglecting large numbers of animals. The October and November 2007 mass seizures of allegedly maltreated pups and breeding dogs brought the 2007 statistics on alleged breeder neglect and alleged neglect of animals by rescuers into approximate parallel. ANIMAL PEOPLE during the first 11 months of 2007 received information about the seizure of 2,798 allegedly neglected dogs and cats from 33 breeders, other than suspected breeders of fighting dogs, for an average of 85 allegedly neglected animals per case. ANIMAL PEOPLE during the first 11 months of 2007 also received information about the seizure of 3,323 allegedly neglected dogs and cats from 38 rescuers who had web sites, had established cooperative relationships with incorporated nonprofit animal rescue organizations, and often held IRS 501(c)(3) nonprofit status themselves. These cases involved an average of 88 allegedly neglected animals per case. Humane literature has argued for more than 70 years that puppy mill neglect results from the attitude that animals are commodities. Breeders have responded that keeping animals healthy is in the interest of any breeder who hopes to stay in business. For decades, while relatively few people became involved in rescuing, rehabilitating, and adopting out animals from shelters, neglect cases involving recognized rescuers were rare. During the first 15 years that the editor of ANIMAL PEOPLE tracked data on mass neglect cases, 1982-1998, only 156 rescuers who had established cooperative relationships with animal shelters were charged with neglect--but then, after the advent of the Internet made rescue for adoption much easier and more popular, the numbers of rescuer neglect cases soared. In 2005, 37 rescuers were charged with neglect, in cases involving an average of 71 animals apiece. The data suggests that regardless of the motive a person has for
acquiring large numbers of animals, the same problems tend to occur,
typically associated with other problems in the person's life, such as
the death of a family member, a personal health crisis, loss of a
job, abuse of drugs or alcohol, or other factors linked to chronic
depression. --Merritt Clifton
|