|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: June 2007 Cultural defense of cruelty to bulls succeeds in South Africa
CAPE TOWN--Asked to
recognize bullfighting as a "World Heritage" cultural rite,
the United Nations Educational & Scientific Organization may look
toward South Africa for precedents--and find sharply contradictory examples. On the one hand, UNESCO project officer
for peace, human rights and democracy Ben Boys in 2003 lauded South Africa
for becoming the first nation in Africa to add humane education to the
national school curriculum. On the other, the South African National
SPCA has repeatedly been unable to accomplish anything to reduce the ritual
mayhem inflicted on bulls as part of the Zulu "First Fruits"
festival, revived in 1992 after the end of apartheid. "We are not allowed to interfere,"
Cape of Good Hope SPCA spokesperson Cher Poznanovich told Los Angeles
Times staff writer Robyn Dixon in February 2007. "They gouge out
the bulls' eyes, tear their testicles, and kill the bulls with their bare
hands." The cultural pretext for the "First
Fruits" festival spilled over into personal conduct in January 2007,
when a politically well-placed convicted criminal escaped cruelty charges
that could have returned him to prison. "Tony Yengeni, former African National
Congress party chief whip in the South African Parliament, was convicted
of defrauding Parliament by failing to declare a massive discount on a
luxury vehicle during arms deal negotiations," summarized Humane
Education Trust founder Louise van der Merwe. "He was sentenced to
four years in prison, but was released on parole after serving only four
months. "According to news reports,"
van der Merwe told ANIMAL PEOPLE, "Yengeni and Malmesbury Prison
deputy director Chris van Rensburg travelled 150 kilometres to Porterville
to collect a bull for ritual slaughter at his home in Guguletu, Cape Town,
on January 19, 2007. "According to the Cape Argus, 'Yengeni
exerted much effort trying to herd the bullock into the garden, while
one of his business mogul friends even resorted to biting the animal's
tail to get it to move.' Yengeni stabbed the bull with his family's traditional
spear. A group of young men then completed the slaughter. "Two sheep were slaughtered after
the bull," van de Merwe continued. "According to the Argus,
'As the skin was removed from the first sheep, ANC Youth League member
Lunga Ncwana joked with friends that it was a trauma for the other sheep,
who was waiting tied up nearby.' According to the Argus, the ritual killing
of the bull and sheep was 'to wash away the prison curse and integrate
Yengeni spiritually and physically with his family. The crying of the
animal indicated 'the acceptance of the ceremony by the ancestors.'" Asked van der Merwe, "How can we
fight crime and violence when our leaders callously commit cruel acts
of violence against those who are totally defenseless? South Africa's
leaders need to realize that if they want to be world players, they need
to leave anachronisms behind. "As Ben Boys put it in 2003, when
he launched the U.N. Decade of Education for Sustainable Development,"
and helped van der Merwe to present the first All-Africa Humane Education
Summit, "'Teaching children to respect and care for animals and the
wider environment is an important step in sustainable development and
respect for human rights. As the intellectual leaders of our nations,
we are duty bound to lead the way to justice and humanity.'" Pet store employee Jenna Hanslip reportedly
filed a cruelty complaint against Yengeni, based on the Argus account
and an accompanying photograph. "If these allegations are true, then this is definitely a criminal offence under the Animal Protection Act," Cape of Good Hope SPCA spokesperson Andries Venter told the South African Press Association. "For this kind of an offence a court
could sentence a person to up to 12 months imprisonment." Pledged Venter, "Once we have completed
our investigation, we will forward the docket to the police, who will
then hand it over to the state prosecutor for a decision" about how
to proceed. But Arts & Culture ministry spokesperson
Sandile Memela asserted that, "It is the constitutional right of
all indigenous families, groups and families to perform rituals that they
believe reconnect them to their ancestors." Comparing Yengeni's killing to Muslim
and Jewish halaal and kosher slaughter, Memela denounced what she termed
"selective racism that condemns this specific African ritual."
However, Muslim and Jewish slaughtering rules forbid killing or butchering
animals in front of each other, and were intended to kill animals by the
fastest, least painful means available at the time they were codified. Said South African Human Rights Commission
chair Jody Kollapen, "The Commission's perspective is that one cannot
take a simplistic approach to matters like thisS¹We would urge the National
SPCA to engage in a public debate around the issues relating to culture
and cultural liberty and the SPCA's mandate to prevent cruelty to animals." Responded Cape of Good Hope SPCA chief
executive Allan Perrins, "We are legally compelled to address any
and all suspected cases of cruelty to animals, and have done so for 135
years. The SPCA recognises that every citizen's right to practise cultural
activities is legally protected, and recognises the validity and importance
of ritual slaughter. The circumstances under which animals were slaughtered,
not the practice of animal slaughter, is the focus of our investigation." Announced Venter two days later, "There
is inadequate evidence or witnesses to proceed with the prosecution, and
as a result we have decided to drop our investigation." But the matter was hardly ended. Taunted labor minister Membathisi Mdladlana,
"I invite the NSPCA to join us," at a ceremony to honor King
Mampuru of the Bapedi nation and King Nyabela of amaNdebele in Limpopo.
"We will be slaughtering a bull without euthanasing it," Mdladlana
boasted. "We'll ask them to come into the kraal to share in the feast.
We want the bull to bellow--and then we'll sing the praises of our ancestors." NSPCA chief executive Marcelle Meredith
initially declined the invitation, but then reconsidered and accepted
it. "As a leader of our country, the
minister is sure to uphold the law, and we are confident that no suffering
will take place," Meredith told the Cape Times. "We are assured
there is no suffering, if the slaughter is carried out in the traditional
manner by a skilled person, taking into account the transport, handling,
and restraining of the animal." Memela continued to attack. "There's
no need for an organization which hasn't caught up with the social, political
and cultural developments in the country to continue to throw out outdated
laws that promote apartheid attitudes," she told Los Angeles Times
writer Dixon. Johannesburg Mail & Guardian columnist
Fikile-Ntsikelelo Moya wrote that the NSPCA response "came over as
a knee-jerk reaction, inspired by a colonial desire to educate the brutish
natives. A bit of South African history," Moya asserted, "would
tell them that among black South Africans there has always been a perception
that whites care more about animals than they do about black people." "This was just a political issue,"
Meredith asserted. "I believe that the National SPCA, the Human Rights
Commission, the Cultural Linguistic Rights Commission and everyone else
was pulled into a political story which had nothing to do with slaughtering,"
she told reporters after meeting with CLRC officials. Meredith blamed the furor on "the
media" who "came to the Cape of Good Hope branch of the NSPCA
with the story that Yengeni had slaughtered the bull. They should not
have taken this political bait," Meredith said. "The meeting between the NSPCA and us was fruitful and very helpful," said CLRC chair Mongezi Guma. "We made a commitment to find ways to do cultural slaughtering in a way that will promote and protect the welfare of the animals."
|