|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: June 2007 Dogs down, monkeys up in India
BANGALORE, HYDERABAD--Faster
up a tree or the side of a building than a feral cat, biting more powerfully
and often than any street dog, able to leap over monkey-catchers at a
single bound, and usually able to outwit public officials, rhesus macaques
are taking over Indian cities. The chief reason is the recent drastic
decline in street dogs. The ecological role of Indian street dogs
is threefold. As scavengers, street dogs consume edible refuse. As predators,
street dogs hunt the rats and mice who infest the refuse piles. In addition,
as territorial pack animals, street dogs chase other scavengers and predators
out of their habitat. Monkeys and pigs, in particular, have
traditionally been controlled by the combination of dogs consuming the
available food supply and packs of dogs chasing them--although monkeys
have been known to befriend dogs, and dogs to adopt and nurse orphaned
rhesus macaques. One dog is no match for a troupe of macaques
or herd of pigs, but several dogs usually prevail. Now the Indian street ecology is abruptly
changing. More streets are paved, discouraging pigs, who prefer muddy
habitats where they can root and wallow. But as refuse collection has
often not improved, more food waste is left to scavenge. Paved roads allow cars and trucks to go
faster, posing a greater threat to dogs, who forage in the streets, and
not long ago often napped in mid-intersection. Beyond the vehicular threat to dogs, the federally encouraged Animal Birth Control programs have markedly reduced dog reproduction in many Indian cities. Panic-driven purges following recent dog attacks have swept the streets of even the sterilized dogs in some cities, notably Banglore and Hyderabad.
But the garbage remains, more abundant
than ever, and monkeys are quick to seize the opportunity, often taking
arboreal routes above the traffic that hits their canine rivals. Frequently
they detour into homes through open windows or balcony doorways. The succession of street species was illustrated
in April and May 2007 in the Bangalore suburb of Yelahanka. Just as the furor over fatal dog attacks
on children in other Bangalore suburbs on January 5 and March 1 began
to settle, street dogs reportedly either mauled or killed a child in Yelahanka. What exactly happened is still unclear.
According to New India Press, the victim was a three-year-old, who was
attacked on April 13, but two days earlier Bangalore activist Gopi Shankar
posted to the Bangalore Animals newsgroup, "We had a six year old
boy die of rabies yesterday at Yelahanka, about 20 kms north of Bangalore,
in an area which was not covered by ABC, or for that matter any sort of
dog management. "According to some reports,"
Shankar continued, "the boy was bitten by a dog on March 25, and
did not inform his parents, who are quite poor. But nobody has found the
rabid dog, nor is it confirmed if the boy was indeed bitten by dogs. "According to some local residents,"
Shankar added, "the area has had some dogs released by Bangalore
municipal vans. These dogs were caught from within the city limits." Yelahanka is among the areas where an
Animal Help Ahmedabad surgical team had already contracted to sterilize
street dogs. Before the team arrived, however, dogs were the targets of
several days of mob violence. "It's monkey trouble in Yelahanka," headlined The Hindu three weeks later, on May 8, 2007. Correspondent Divya Gandhi described a
simian home invasion. "About 20 monkeys ripped through every edible item in the kitchen," she wrote. "The resident, blood boiling, saw visions of bumping them off with a shotgun."
A parallel story had already developed
quite predictably in Chitradurga, where The Hindu on March 3, 2007 reported
that the city administration "has decided to cull at least 1,000
dogs in the next four days." The spring dog killing, undertaken contrary
to federal law, is an annual exercise, The Hindu noted, mentioning that
600 dogs were killed in 2006. "Monkey menace in Chitradurga,"
headlined The Hindu on April 29, 2007. "After reports
of at least six people being attacked by monkeys," The Hindu elaborated,
"residents of a few localities here are living in fear owing to increased
monkey menace. Women and children, in particular, are vulnerable victims. "Forest official S. Neelakanthappa
said the foray of monkeys into human habitation in summer is common,"
offering to "provide experts to the civic body to catch monkeys,"
The Hindu added. The relationship between the annual dog
culls and the monkey incursions somehow eluded notice--and eluded notice
likewise in Tiruchi. "Recent instances of poisoning of
stray dogs in Tiruchi have caused disgust among volunteers involved with
the Animal Birth Control and Rabies Elimination Project of the International
Animal Rescue," wrote R. Krishnamoorthy on March 31, 2007. "Over
the past few years, the volunteers have sterilized as many as 2,400 dogs
in the city." On February 22 and March 1, 2007, R. Rajaram
of The Hindu reported Forest Department captures of 73 monkeys from three
different troupes in the vicinity, who "would be released in Puliancholai
reserve forest," with little likelihood of staying there, in view
of the accessibility and attractions of the Tiruchi suburbs. The biggest and most obvious example of
monkeys taking over habitat left by dogs might have been in Hyderabad.
Yet there too hardly anyone seemed to notice. The background, Blue Cross of India chair
Chinny Krishna explained to the Asian Animal Protection Network, is that,
"The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad two years ago stopped the
successful ABC program carried out by the Blue Cross of Hyderabad and
People for Animals, saying they would do it themselves. Close to 20,000
dogs were caught in the last two years and less than 1,500 were fixed,
as per municipal records." In other words, about 18,500 Hyderabad
street dogs were killed. Even more dogs were captured and massacred after
a fatal dog attack in an outlying suburb of Hyderabad on March 28, 2007. Killing dogs is politically popular in
Hyderabad--but with the typical result. "The civic administration might be winning accolades on several fronts, but containing the monkey menace in the city is not one of them," noted T. Lalith Singh of The Hindu on May 8, 2007. "Handicapped by lack of trained professionals
to catch monkeys, Hyderabad may enter into a contract with one private
team that managed to snare 1,529 monkeys in the last year. Civic officials
estimate the simian presence to be anywhere between 5,000 and 10,000." What will be done with the monkeys, if
captured? "A temporary facility with 45 cages
to accommodate some 250 simians has been set up at Amberpet," Singh
wrote. Pressure to kill street dogs and monkeys
often comes, throughout India, from organizations representing poor and
illiterate members of the so-called "scheduled castes." Politicians
seeking the so-called "scheduled caste vote" frequently use
community upset over dog attacks as a pretext for asserting that Animal
Birth Control programs are a hobby of the rich, diverting funds from helping
the poor, putting dog catchers out of work, exposing the poor to mauling
and maimings, and chiefly benefiting veterinarians and makers of anti-rabies
vaccine. Dog attacks and especially rabies cases
have markedly decreased wherever ABC has been practiced successfully,
but the allegations against ABC have gained political momentum, based
on the argument that street dogs threaten the rights of poor people. The
same argument is also advanced against monkeys. Former Indian minister of animal welfare
and People for Animals founder Maneka Gandhi on May 1, 2007 testified
to the Andrha Pradesh State Human Rights Commission that "the monkey
menace in residential localities could be eliminated if people stop feeding
monkeys," The Hindu summarized. Mrs. Gandhi founded the ministry for animal
welfare as a project of her former portfolio as minister for social welfare
and empowerment, responsible for improving the lives of the poorest of
the poor, but her credentials and testimony failed to change the outlook
of the Human Rights Commission, which had already favored purging street
dogs and has extended that policy to monkeys. As with street dogs, who are "the
dog menace" to some, but are community pets to others, street monkeys
have human friends and defenders, many of whom do feed them. In one extreme case, in Rohtas, a Patna
suburb, a man named Dadan Singh "started off by feeding 45 monkeys,
but now there are 772," he told Ramlala Singh and Prabhakar Kumar
of CNN on April 21, 2007. "Feeding so many monkeys is not an easy
task," Singh added. "But most households of the village contribute,"
he said, "and they do it willingly." Also as with street dogs, street monkeys
can be helpful--when not being nuisances. "Once I was surrounded
by dacoits [bandits]. I called out for the monkeys and they helped me,"
Dadan Singh claimed. "Since that day I decided to take care of the
monkeys." But monkey-feeding, also like dog-feeding,
is sometimes a prelude to poisoning--as occurred in August 2006 at Kurvanoothupalam,
Tamil Nadu, where 14 monkeys who had been accused of crop-raiding were
found buried in an orchard. Reports of mass monkey poisoning so far
are relatively few, but reports of rampaging monkeys in spring 2007 came
from all parts of India. At Jorhat, in the extreme eastern part
of the nation, a member of a marauding troupe in early February 2007 reportedly
seized but later released a human infant. In Nalgonda, far to the south, attorney
Gajji Kurumulu in mid-February filed a lawsuit alleging that 450 monkeys
had created havoc for more than a year due to civic indifference. At Udupi, on the west coast, The Hindu
reported in late March 2007, monkeys attacked "nearly 30 persons." In Udhagamandalam, said The Hindu, Coonoor
Citizens Forum secretary M.P.G. Nambisan "expressed serious concern
over the menace caused by monkeys and stray dogs," and even noted
both the role of haphazard refuse disposal and the ascendance of monkeys
as a greater threat than dogs.
|