|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: July-August 2007 Dolphin captures in Solomon Islands are linked to Panama, Dubai
GAVATU-- As of July
24, 2007, Canadian dolphin broker Christopher Porter was reportedly holding
as many as 50 recently captured dolphins in sea pens at Malaita in the
Solomon Islands. "Ocean Embassy, also known as the
Wildlife International Network, is in the Solomon Islands trying to export
the dolphins to Dubai," Dolphin Project founder Ric O'Barry told
ANIMAL PEOPLE. Five new dolphin facilities in Dubai want dolphins, whales,
polar bears--every marine mammal they can get. Ocean
Embassy is the broker. "Somehow Ocean Embassy has been able to stay out of the media regarding Dubai," O'Barry added. "They brokered the deal but Porter gets all of the attention. Ocean Embassy represents big money," O'Barry continued. "They dwarf Porter's operation. The parent corporation began selling securities via a private placement offering in the United States in late 2003. At present, the parent company is represented by 195 investors from the United States, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and France. "Capital raised through the private
placement offering enabled the founders and management team to create
Ocean Embassy Panama as the inaugural site for the company," O'Barry
said. "Ocean Embassy Panama is located in the San Carlos District
on the Pacific coast of Panama. The company began construction in San
Carlos in August 2006." The San Carlos area "could become
the next Orlando," former Sea World senior dolphin trainer Mark Simmons
told Los Angeles Times staff writer Chris Kraul. Kraul identified Simmons
as executive vice president of Wildlife International Network. "As proposed, " wrote Kraul,
"the $500-million resort and residential community would be built
on a 700-acre site 50 miles west of Panama City. The centerpiece would
be an interactive aquatic park where tourists would pay $100 or more to
frolic for a few minutes with the friends of Flipper." Noting that polls show 81% of Panamanians
oppose dolphin captures, Kraul predicted that, "In the end, the fate
of the Ocean Embassy theme park may hinge on politics. President Martin
Torrijos has not taken a public stand, but is said to be concerned that
the park might spur U.S. environmentalists to oppose a bilateral free
trade agreement that goes before lawmakers in both countries later this
year." O'Barry and others have been concerned
that the Ocean Embassy development in Panama might become a base for exporting
dolphins throughout the world, whether captured in Panamian waters or
elsewhere. "The export of Panamanian dolphins and whales was in fact
part of the free trade negotiations, conducted secretly while the Panamanian
people were being assured that there will be no such exports," charged
Eric Jackson of the Panama News. Contending that he is "working to
provide a live alternative use" for dolphins who would otherwise
be hunted for their teeth and meat, Porter on July 3, 2007 challenged
Ric O'Barry of the Dolphin Project to debate--"Ideally at Fanalei
in the Solomon Islands, a village that continues to practice dolphin hunting,"
but perhaps instead at "a Starbucks in San Francisco." O'Barry accepted the invitation, but declined
the Solomon Islands venue in light of a July 2, 2007 Reuters report about
how "Followers of a warlord" in that region "tortured and
beheaded at least three men 10 days ago and razed an entire village"
of 500 people, ahead of the anticipated arrival of 2,000 international
peacekeepers. O'Barry asked that the debate be held "in the offices
of the Secretariat of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora in Geneva, Switzerland," with experts
on zoonotic disease transmission between humans and dolphins present.
In addition, O'Barry asked Porter to "include your fellow dolphin
dealers in the debate. Their names are Dr. Ted N. Turner, Robin Friday,
Mark Simmons and Dr. Ted Hammond." ANIMAL PEOPLE took the opportunity to
ask Porter, "How many dolphins per year are killed for teeth and
meat by the residents of the Solomon Islands? How many are killed by the
people you are working with? How does this compare to the mortality rate
in capture and transportation? Can you cite any examples, from anywhere
in the world, where promoting a dolphin capture industry has led to a
net reduction in the numbers of dolphins killed for other purposes?" Porter replied four times within the next
seven hours, without actually answering any of the questions--but Solomon
Islands political office holder Lawrence Makili pointed out that, "There
are only two places in Malaita," the island where Porter has his
dolphin capture operation, "that hunt dolphins for teeth: Lau, at
the northern end of the island, and Fanalei at the southern end of the
Island. The Fanalei people were originally from Lau," Makili explained.
Other Malaita residents "don't hunt dolphins." And even the
dolphin hunters hunt dolphins "primarily to get teeth for the bride
price, not for food," Makili said. Both ANIMAL PEOPLE and O'Barry also asked
Porter to account for the dolphins he captured in his first major export
venture in the Solomons. Wrote O'Barry, "It is my understanding that
you originally captured about 170 dolphins back in 2003. Of those, 28
were transported to Cancun, Mexico. As you know, several of them died
at Park Nizuk. In 2004, 15 of the survivors were transferred to Cozumel.
If these figures are correct, this means that about 142 dolphins stayed
with you in Fanalei. In 2004, you stated that you only had 44 dolphins
left. In 2005 you had 26, and in 2006 you had 20. Then there were none.
This was in June 2007, shortly before you started capturing dolphins for
Dubai." Porter did not account for any of the
122 dolphins whose fate is unknown.
|