JULY-AUGUST 2007
Noah's Wish settles with California A.G.
SACRAMENTO--The animal disaster relief charity
Noah's Wish is back in business, after six months of investigation
and restructuring mandated by California attorney general Jerry
Brown.
"We have entered into an agreement that will permit Noah's
Wish to continue serving the animal victims of disasters,"
the Noah's Wish board of directors posted on July 27, 2007.
"Under the settlement agreement," reported Associated
Press writer Laura Kurtzman, "the state will take control of
the $4 million," of about $8.4 million raised in appeals for
help for the animal victims of Hurricane Katrina, "that has
not yet been spent. It is supposed to be given to help the animal
victims of Katrina, which happened nearly two years ago, as well
as to build a new animal shelter in Slidell, Louisiana."
Added Christine Harvey of the St. Tammany bureau of the New Orleans
Times-Picayune, "The agreement stipulates that Slidell will
receive $1 million to build a new animal shelter, though city finance
director Sharon Howes said this week that the Calif-ornia attorney
general's office is willing to redirect as much as $3 million"
for the shelter construction. California attorney general's office
spokesperson Gareth Lacy told Harvey that he couldn't confirm that
Slidell would receive the full $3 million, since the money first
must be received from Noah's Wish.
Wrote Harvey, "The agreement stipulates that the organization
must transfer $3.8 million by Aug. 17, 2007, with the remaining
$200,000 due next July. The agreement also states that [Noah's Wish
founder Terri] Crisp may not serve as an 'officer, director or trustee'
with any nonprofit organization for five years, though she already
has started a new organization called Animal Resources, which has
a purpose similar to Noah's Wish. She said the attorney general's
office knows about her involvement at Animal Resources and approves,
as she is not on the board and has no fiduciary responsibilities."
"Terri Crisp was chosen to fill the position of disaster operations
director," Animal Resources acting board chair Dean Richman
told ANIMAL PEOPLE.
Animal Resources lists Sheri Thompson as disaster operations assistant
director. Sacramento Business Journal staff writer Kelly Johnson
reported in March 2007 that, "For the second half of 2005,"
in which most of the Katrina donations arrived, "Noah's Wish
paid $405,948 in salaries and compensation, according to an IRS
Form 990 supplied by a former employee. Crisp received $140,900.
The next highest compensation went to Sheri Thompson at $118,125."
The Form 990 that Johnson obtained is not yet accessible via <www.Guide-star.org>,
which posts charities' annual filings for the Internal Revenue Service.
"The attorney general's office notes in the agreement that
Noah's Wish spent about $1.4 million on Katrina relief efforts,"
wrote Harvey, "and has $4 million left in the bank. It appears
the organization spent the remaining money 'primarily to further
the general charitable purpose of Noah's Wish, including overhead
costs,' the agreement states."
But many expenditures were questioned by former Noah's Wish administrative
assistant Thea Martin and former former Noah's Wish bookkeeper Mina
Johnson. Among the questioned items, Crisp hired her daughter, Jennifer
McKim, as communications director, and hired McKim's boyfriend to
do database development.
She also "bought a new, fully loaded Ford Excursion for herself
and a Nissan Titan truck for McKim, as well as horse trailers and
an all-terrain vehicle that Johnson said Crisp's children rode on
her property," summarized Harvey.
"The settlement includes a provision that Noah's Wish must
review its vehicle inventory to determine whether the vehicles purchased
after Katrina are being used in accordance with the organization's
charitable purpose, and present its findings to the attorney general's
office for approval," Harvey added. "Should the investigators
determine the vehicles were not a legitimate purchase, Noah's Wish
must sell the vehicles and transfer the money from the sale to the
attorney general's office for distribution to charity."
Wildlife Fund Thailand shuts down
BANGKOK--Wildlife Fund Thailand president Pisit
na Phattalung on June 19, 2007 abruptly suspended WFT operations
and laid off all 40 staff and volunteers, effective on July 27.
"Pisit cited financial constraints. WFT staff were skeptical,"
reported Apinya Wipatayotin of the Bangkok Post, "saying Pisit
used the financial problems to get rid of staff who had accused
him of misconduct-- such as involvement [through his private company
Asian Wildlife Consultancy] in the export of eight Thai elephants
to Australian zoos [in November 2006], providing rare species of
wildlife to the Chiang Mai Night Safari park, and using his position
as foundation president to attain a post at the privately-run Siam
Ocean World aquarium."
Former WFT secretary general Surapol Duangkhae "accused Pisit
of having a conflict of interest and not being fit for the presidency
of the organization," Apinya wrote. "In May, Pisit transferred
Surapol and his aide Hannarong Yaowaloes to inactive posts. Their
relationship soured when the two criticized Pisit's wildlife trading
business."
"We will file a complaint with the court because his wildlife
trading business is against the foundation's objectives," Surapol
threatened.
Pisit reportedly also owns a restaurant called Puen Deratchan, which
includes a private mini-zoo.
Ten Thai organizations including Friends of the Asian elephant
in May 2007 announced they would boycott involvement with WFT unless
Pisit resigns.
The WFT closure may jeopardize the 13-year-old Khao Phaeng Ma reforestation
and wild gaur rehabilitation project, Apinya said.
"Once a bald mountain, Khao Phaeng Ma is now covered with
dense forest. The number of gaur has increased from less than 10
a decade ago to more than 100 today," Apinya recounted.
However, "Khao Phaeng Ma is now under threat from encroachment
and wildlife poaching due to staff shortages," Apinya continued,
"because the National Park, Wildlife & Plant Conservation
Department could not provide staff" to replace WFT personnel.
"WFT executives reportedly circulated a letter to the project's
financial supporters, informing them that the foundation is no longer
responsible for Khao Phaeng Ma," Apinya said.
Hannarong told the Bangkok Nation that while Pisit claimed WFT
had run out of cash, it had about $125,000 each in donated cash,
bonds, and an unused building fund, about $19,000 in money allocated
toward unpaid salaries, and a headquarters worth about $475,000.
"Should the foundation be dissolved, these assets must be
returned to the Siam Society or the family of Dr. Boonsong Lekagul,"
said Hannarong.
Boonsang (1907-1992) started WFT in 1983 under the patronage of
Queen Sirikit, 21 years after founding the Bangkok Bird Club. The
Bird Club was reputedly the first indigenous Thai conservation society
in modern times. The organization was long associated with the World
Wildlife Fund, which is now represented in Thailand by the WWF Thailand
Country Programme.
House Rabbit Society is hopping mad at PetSmart
PHOENIX--Just as PetSmart Charities should have
been basking in success, the nonprofit subsidiary of the PetSmart
pet supply chain found itself uncomfortably caught between the parent
company and the humane community.
PetSmart Charities on June 25, 2007 celebrated the three millionth
animal adoption through the 928 PetSmart in-store adoption centers
since the PetSmart chain started in 1987--five years before PetSmart
Charities was formed to manage the adoption program and help fund
the work of the 3,400 participating animal welfare agencies.
Within days, however, PetSmart announced that it "is testing
the sale of spayed and neutered dwarf rabbits as part of the selection
of small pets we offer for sale," at 25 selected stores."
PetSmart sales of other small mammals, birds, and reptiles have
already occasioned considerable friction with humane organizations.
PetSmart Charities was founded in part to ease the relationship
between the for-profit store chain and the humane community--and
all but one of the five heads of PetSmart Charities to date has
recommended that PetSmart stop selling any animals, each has told
ANIMAL PEOPLE.
"Our decision to sell dwarf rabbits does not change our relationship
with adoption agencies who facilitate rabbit adoptions," PetSmart
claimed, mentioning that it "partners with 40 rabbit-only shelters
and many other rabbit-friendly shelters in the U.S. and Canada,"
and has helped to adopt out 2,900 rabbits since 2002.
But House Rabbit Society president Kathleen Wilsbach told PetSmart
chief operating officer Robert F. Moran that, "To say that
we are disappointed by PetSmart's violation of its own commitment
to save rescued animals would be a gross understatement."
The House Rabbit Society statement was soon seconded and amplified
by the Best Friends Animal Society, followed by many other leading
animal advocacy organizations. "Although spaying/neutering
does prevent reproduction, it does not prevent--or even acknowledge--the
myriad other reasons why rabbits end up in shelters," Wilsbach
wrote.
"Contrary to popular belief, rabbits are not low-maintenance,"
Wilsbach continued. "Compared to dogs and cats, they are high-maintenance.
While you maintain that your veterinarians will teach your staff
about rabbit care, pet store staff are generally short-term or part-time
employees, often teenagers, most of whom have never lived with even
one rabbitSıThey simply do not have the knowledge, skills, or inclination
to properly educate the public about these complex animals."
"We were asked to provide our input on the dwarf rabbit test,"
PetSmart Charities director Susana Della Maddelena told ANIMAL PEOPLE.
"We advised PetSmart that the introduction of any new species
into the stores would invoke a negative response from the animal
welfare community. Our role is to advise in these situations,"
she said, "but we do not have final authority over the decisions
made. We are planning to compile information regarding rabbit relinquishment
for PetSmart to analyze as part of the test."
ANIMAL PEOPLE found in a 2006 review of data from 15 dog-and-cat
humane societies that accept rabbits that rabbits were about 3%
of their total animal intake. They received from three to 76 rabbits,
with a median and average of 34.
|