|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: September 2007 Camel jockey civil rights case refiled in Kentucky after Florida dismissal
LEXINGTON, Ky.--Plaintiffs
including the parents of five unnamed boys who were allegedly enslaved
in Dubai as camel jockeys filed a class action lawsuit during the second
week of September 2007 against Sheikh Hamdan bin Rashid al Maktoum, brother
of the ruler of Dubai. The ruler, Sheikh Mohammed bid Rashid
al Maktoum, was in Lexington, Kentucky, to attend the annual Keeneland
September Yearling Sale, where the family has reportedly paid as much
as $3 million for highly regarded thoroughbred horses. The lawsuit alleges that Sheikh Hamdan was complicit in enslaving as many as 30,000 children during the past 30 years for use as camel jockeys--a misnomer, since the children, sometimes as young as four years of age, are tied to the backs of the racing camels, and have no ability to control them. Many are thrown and injured, or even killed. Foreign visitors including Prince Charles
of Britain at one time were prominent at high-stakes camel races in Dubai
and elsewhere in the oil-rich portions of the Middle East. Camel racing
fell into disrepute, however, after human rights organizations documented
that the jockeys are often bought from poor families in nations including
Bangladesh and Sudan, with the promise that they would be given good jobs
and an education. Rarely is the promise fulfilled. The lives and fates of the camels, meanwhile,
are similar to those of racehorses: winners live longer. Losers go to
slaughter. Injuries are frequent. Drugging and other chicanery harmful
to the animals is much more often alleged by losing bettors than proven--
and the political and economic influence of the camel racing stable owners,
in nations with traditionally low regard for human rights, tends to thwart
close policing. The Kentucky case parallels a 2006 filing
against both Sheikh Hamdan and Sheikh Mohammed in Miami. U.S. federal
judge Cecilia Altonaga on July 30, 2007 ruled that because neither the
sheikhs nor the plaintiffs reside in the U.S., and none of the alleged
wrongful actions occurred in the U.S., the case should not be tried in
a U.S. court. "Although the new lawsuit does not
specifically name anyone other than Sheikh Hamdan as a defendant,"
said Canadian Press, "it includes other unnamed defendants who are
accused of being accomplices." The case was filed both in Florida
and in Kentucky under the Alien Tort Statute, an 18th century federal
law originally used against pirates and on behalf of sailors who were
impressed into service against their will by the British Navy. "The lawsuit had reached the highest levels of the U.S. government," Canadian Press said, "with the Emirates leaders appealing directly to President George W. Bush to intervene. The U.S. State Department served notice [in the Miami case] that it would do so, arguing that sovereign immunity protected the two sheiks from the lawsuit."
|