|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: September 2007 European Parliament moves to halt monkey use in labs
STRASBOURG--Four hundred
thirty-five of the 785 members of the European Parliament on September
6, 2007 endorsed a two-part written declaration asking the European Commission
to "make ending the use of apes and wild-caught monkeys in scientific
experiments an urgent priority," and to "establish a timetable
for replacing the use of all primates in scientific experiments." The declaration against primate use drew
more support than any previous European Parliament animal welfare measure,
"and the third highest number of signatures on any declaration since
2000," said Animal Defenders International press officer Allison
Tuffrey Jones. European Parliament animal welfare panel
chair Neil Parish enlarged the topic to other species, telling news media
that the declaration "sends a clear message to the Commission that
animal experimentation should be phased out." European laboratories use about 10,000
nonhuman primates per year, according to ADI. About 40% of the total are
used in Brtain. The nations next most involved in doing nonhuman primate
studies are France and Germany. "A European Commission survey from
2006 found that 80% of Europeans are against the use of primates for scientific
purposes," said Agence France-Presse. Pushing the declaration forward was British
songwriter Maria Daines' second pro-animal composition of the summer to
top the independent online pop rock charts. Daines released Monkey In
A Cage about one month after producing One Small Dog to benefit the Homeless
Animal Protection Society of Ethiopia. As a publicity stunt, Daines and
several other celebrities posed in a primate transport case. ADI tactics included distributing monkey
doorhangers to the members of the European Parliament, plus "novelty
bags with serious reportsS¹alongside credit card-size monkey mints and
bathtime luxuries," said Tuffrey Jones. The campaign gained momentum after Justice
John Mitting of the British High Court ruled on July 27, 2007 that the
British Home Office improperly understated the degree of suffering that
marmosets would experience when it licensed invasive brain experiments
at Cambridge University. "The case was brought after a 10-month
undercover investigation by the British Union Against Vivisection at a
Cambridge neuroscience lab during 2000 and 2001," summarized Mike
Taylor of The Independent. "The investigation revealed that the Home
Office had assigned a 'moderate' suffering category to experiments which
included such procedures as removing the top of a marmoset's head and
part of the brain to induce strokes. Guidelines state that any procedure
which 'may lead to a major departure from the animal's usual state of
health and wellbeing' must be categorised as 'substantial.'" The Home Office intends to appeal the
verdict. Justice Mitting rejected three other BUAV
contentions. In April 2007, the parliament of Bremen
state, Germany unanimously asked the University of Bremen to halt macaque
brain experiments conducted by neuroscientist Andreas Kreitur. The experiments
are licensed to continue to the end of 2008. "Neither the state parliament nor the state government can order the university to close down the [brain research] center," explained Quirin Schiermeier in Nature, "but Kreiter fears that political pressure will force the local authorities not to approve further experiments."
|