|
This site built and maintained by: GREANVILLE ASSOCIATESand CRESCENT COMMUNICATIONS •Rev. 12.1.05 Copyright ANIMAL PEOPLE, INC. 1992--2006
|
MONTH: September 2007 Malaysian humane community stops Selayang dog-catching contest
SELAYANG, Malaysia--The
Selayang Municipal Council on September 13, 2007 cancelled a dogcatching
contest begun the previous week, which had offered 78,000 ringgit--about
$22,200--in cash prizes. Selangor council president Zainal Abidin
Azim opened the dog-catching contest on September 5, in response, he said,
to receiving about 80 complaints per month about stray dogs. Teams or
individuals were required to catch at least 150 dogs in six months to
qualify for awards of 15,000, 13,000, and 11,000 ringgit. The contest started out with the endorsement
of Rawang state assembly member Tang See Hang, who posed for photographers
"capturing" a cardboard cutout of a dog. Asked what would become of dogs caught
during the contest, Tang See Hung told media, "Anyone who wishes
to rear the dogs will be welcome to pick them up. Otherwise we would dispose
of them through the council's own methods." Amended Selangor First Minister Mohamed
Khir Toyo, after Tang See Hung's remarks were fiercely denounced in the
letters columns of the Malaysia Star and New Straits Times, "All
the animals caught will be given to the SPCA, and the dogs would be housed,
or even put to sleep, based on their reasonable expertise. "Competitions like this are good,"
Khir Toyo continued. "Dog-catching must be done, as strays could
attack children or even adults. The animals could also spread diseases,
as the strays rummage through garbage and get skin diseases." But Khir Toyo told Edward Rajendra of
the Malaysia Star that too much prize money was offered. "We have
to create a commitment among the public to control the number of strays,"
Khir Toyo said, but not with such exorbitant prizes." Rebutted SPCA Selangor chair Christine
Chin, "We can't propagate a fun and festive mood in dog catching,
as the whole idea is wrong. Having such a competition encourages cruelty."
Chin further pointed out that the SPCA Selangor is not a municipal animal
control agency. "The SPCA does not catch or destroy animals,"
Chin said. "In fact it is wrong to say that the dogs would be handed
to us. Our role is to prevent cruelty to animals, promote kindness to
animals, and encourage responsible pet ownership." Other Malaysian humane societies amplified
Chin's criticisms. "We believe, this inhumane competition
will not only subject stray dogs to cruelty, but will cause dognapping,
because it will be easier and faster [to catch tame dogs] to fulfill the
prize eligibility," said Nick Josh K. Karean of the Humane Society
Independent Group of Malaysia. Karean started a worldwide electronic petition
against the contest. Furry Friends spokesperson Sabrina Yeap
recommended that the reward fund should be spent instead to hire professional
dog-catchers, whose methods would meet acceptable humane standards. Explained Malaysian Animal Rights &
Welfare Society president and attorney N. Surendran to Mazlinda Mahmood
of the New Straits Times, "The only proven way to solve the problem
is a comprehensive spaying campaign, coupled with a public education program
to teach owners to neuter their pets and not abandon them." Surendran recommended the introduction
of licensing with discounts for sterilized pets, and alleged that the
Selangor council "is committing cruelty to animals and exposing the
public to danger. Who's going to be liable," Surendran asked, "if
someone is bitten? The council could be sued and taxpayers would have
to foot the bill." Agreed veterinarian Lynnette Low, displaying
scars on her arms to Mahmood, "Even professionals get hurt when they
deal with dogs." Said dog rescuer Natasha Valerie Fernz,
"When dogs are cornered, their natural reaction is to bite. Then
people will blame the dogs and say they should be destroyed." As the issue heated up, Selayang Municipal
Council president Zainal Abidin avoided humane delegations by taking a
leave of absence. Hecklers confronted 30 animals advocates on September
11, but failed to provoke a hostile response. The Selangor campaign paralleled the humane
response a year earlier, after 13 dogs were shot by order of the Seremban
Municipal Council. An ad hoc Coalition Against Dog Shooting & Other
Inhumane Methods formed, including six animal welfare organizations and
two organizations focused on human rights and welfare. Another dog shooting followed, in front
of more than 100 young witnesses in the compound of a secondary school
in Ipoh. Under pressure from the children, many of their parents, and
the Coalition Against Dog Shooting, the Ipoh City Council voted to "use
tranquilisers instead of bullets from now on," explained mayor Mohamad
Rafiai Mokhtar to news media. Protest saves pigsProtest based on ethnic and economic grievances,
more familiar to most Malaysians, meanwhile saved as many as 150,000 pigs
in early September 2007--at least until they reached normal slaughtering
weight. For most of the day on September 4, about
100 villagers including women and children stood off between 200 and 300
police officers, half of the police in riot gear, after the police descended
on Paya Mengkuang, Malacca, with six excavators to dig mass graves for
culled pigs, plus several trucks outfitted with water cannon. The Malacca state government had ordered
the closure of 15 farms with a combined total of 150,000 pigs. Similar stand-offs reportedly came at
Ayer Molek and Bukit Beruang villages. Agence France-Press said late in the day
that the pig-killing had finally started. "More than 60% of Malaysians
are Muslim and consider pigs and pork unclean," Agence France-Press
explained. "The country's pig farmers are mostly from Malaysia's
sizeable Chinese population. Malaccan government spokespersons denied on September 5 that any pigs were killed. Instead, they announced, an agreement had been reached whereby the farmers agreed to sell 2,000 pigs per day to reduce the pig population to 48,000 by September 21.
|